CenTer for appellate litigation New York conspiracists target Sandy Hook. Justice for sale.

Ms. Skolnick,

David and I spoke at length about which direction to proceed. He did promise a 440- it was I that said to pursue the appeal first. Which was my mistake because the appeal was only allowed to cover what transpired in those laughable 4days.

We never addressed the fraud, nor the newly uncovered fraud.

But, that’s ok. You simply did not have the resources needed and your heart isn’t in it.

Blake was never challenged for his fraud. The release of the FOIL is enough to re-open and retry- it’s irrefutable evidence of his fraud, and the very motive the neighbor would lie.
He stated there was gun violence to which there was none.

I understand your limitations and appreciate you taking the time to try to explain. But, every life is of value, and whether or not they receive full or partial representation shouldn’t be dependent on one’s sentence or lack thereof.

To be honest, I’d love for this app to be true- I’d have accepted the Disorderly slap on the wrist. Also, I have been very very vocal to the 46+million people who’ve followed this on our Sandy Hook site- if I was NOT telling the truth OR it WASNT easily proved, I’d have been re-arrested.

Any day now, Blake will be indicted. I have full and complete faith in Tish James..

J.

Comprehensive- complete; including all or nearly all elements.

ONLY ADA Anjelica Gregory’s Suborned Perjury based on Kevin Blake’s fraud was the ONLY element included, AND left unchallenged.

On Jul 31, 2019, at 11:39 AM, Kate Skolnick wrote:


Mr. Rinaldi,
I'm sorry that you feel our representation was not as comprehensive as you would have liked. In responding to your e-mail, I looked back over correspondence that Dave Bernstein had with you. What he promised was not that he definitely would file a 440 motion but rather that he would determine, after the appeal, whether you could have a viable claim under C.P.L. Art. 440. In his judgment, which I stand by, there was not enough for one. The reason is that 440 requires typically not only off-record evidence but also some proof that the off-record evidence would have made a difference to the outcome of your case. In your case, even though there were things that happened that did not come out during the trial, in our judgment as lawyers who have practiced for a while and handled such motions, there simply was not enough for a colorable claim.

That said, if you believe otherwise, you are welcome to pursue one with the material you have gathered. I wish you luck with this.

Best,
Kate Skolnick



-----Original Message-----
From: SandyHook Center [mailto:sandyhookcenter@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 11:14 AM
To: Kate Skolnick
Subject: Re: THANK YOU.

Thank You for getting back to me.

It’s mind blowing that neither your office nor Legal Aid has ever done an investigation- I was able to contradict the Informational Report/ General Investigation in minutes. And received evidence to support it in less than 5business days by a Police Captain.

The result is that fighting an NYPD Sergeant, that created false evidence, and the powerful Gavin DeBecker who then provided the ADA with a Kirkland Ellis Post is quite telling- NYC is infested with gross negligence and massive abuse of power. The fact that ZERO investigations were ever conducted proves our most vulnerable are simply thrown away for those of more social standing.

Had I known I would’ve made other arrangements.

I do however understand, and would prefer your limited resources were placed on those in most need. But, the fact that this little episode has caused a failed suicide attempt of my mother- leaving her brain damaged and in need of 24/7 care, not to mention that this abuse has further terrorized Newtown, an already shattered community one would question priorities.

As it stands, Kevin Blake pulled the registration for my car, which is titled to my Skadden Arps filed 501c3. He knew all along that we were legitimate- NY State already verified it.

Thank You for your support, Ms. Skolnick. Both you and Mr. Bernstein have been emotionally supportive. And I understand now you simply hadn’t had the necessary resources, and that must also be addressed.

This system is not just broken, but shattered.

Thank You so very very much- this was very helpful.

David Bernstein had promised a 440 motion afterwards. His strategy was to do the appeal first and then the 440.

John.

I will go forward, and continue our work in Sandy Hook. It’s also the best way to get Blake indicted as the actual criminal he is.

I swallowed a razor to make a statement in Rikers- I refrained because the guards read a NYPost article saying “Brooke Had Mommy Issues.” I was never put in a cell, and treated really well as they surmised Brooke was a lying sociopath. I survived because I had faith in our NY justice system- every one has failed.

Imagine if I was a black or brown person- I can only imagine the lives they must lead.

John.

On Jul 31, 2019, at 9:51 AM, Kate Skolnick wrote:

Mr. Rinaldi,

Every case that comes through the office is screened for possible inclusion in the Justice First Project, though there are specific criteria for when a case is officially placed in the project and fully reinvestigated. Among those criteria is that the client is serving a long prison sentence.

However, there is typically some investigation done in every case, including things like reviewing documents (such as the ones you sent us), and speaking with trial counsel and obtaining his or her files. In this case, David Bernstein conducted that investigation. However, there is no formal "investigation file" in your case. Our conclusion that we do not perceive a basis for a C.P.L. Art. 440 motion is based on those conversations and investigation. That conclusion remains unchanged. I am sorry that we cannot be of further assistance to you. If there are specific documents that you believe we have that you would like, please let me know. However, there is no "investigation file" to provide.

I am pleased to hear that you are focusing on the Sandy Hook Center work and encourage you to continue that going forward.

Best,
Kate Skolnick
Supervising Attorney
Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
CENTER FOR APPELLATE LITIGATION
120 Wall Street – 28th Floor
New York, NY 10005
212.577.2523 ext. 501
Fax: 212.577.2535
kskolnick@cfal.org



-----Original Message-----
From: SandyHook Center [mailto:sandyhookcenter@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:03 AM
To: Kate Skolnick
Subject:

Ms. Skolnick,

Good Morning.

I was just told, that the CenTer For Appellate Litigation has an investigation unit. If I may ask, was there any investigation done in my case? And if so may I have the information forwarded.

Within minutes of receiving the Informational Report/General Investigation I was able to discern how this got so far out of hand- Officer Blake violated s. 175.3, and 175.4 claiming I was a gun violence perpetrator and NOT the gun reform activists that we are.

It’s similar to NYPD Officer Joseph Franco who also forged reports in order to shine- as only 6% of Sergeants make Lieutenant, I believe Blake saw an opportunity and took it.

And if there was an investigation, there should be some information in addition to the Discovery that was sent?

Can you please advise, and then send?

I’m still waiting on the Attorney General, as I have now already met with Mr. Kerry three times, and am now being introduced to Senator Diane Feinstein.

We’ve moved past this NYPD nonsense, and resumed our work at Sandy Hook CenTer.

Also, those of us in Newtown, have dismissed Sergeant Blake’s fraud/perjury as one of the many conspiracies associated with the massacre.

Thank you again for your organization’s assistance.
j.