Court Transcript is AVAILABLE to anyone. 917.243.1808/ or email JohnMRinaldi@aol.com.
According to the CDC, each year there is over 7.5million reports of stalking/harrasment. Of those 7,500,000; 11.6% are proven to be the result of a perjured/false police report. This then wreaks havoc on 664,500 innocent people who are not perpetrators at all, but actual victims.
The 1 in 10 essentially prescribe to the 'crying wolf' syndrome for power and or control. Why? Well, that's simple. It's an easy manipulation, and its very rarely prosecuted should someone be proven to be a liar.
Its wrong and its sociopathic! Lying about what is essentially predatory behavior guarantees the wanted restraining order. Actually, without the appearance of a threat, getting a restraining order is actually difficult. You need a legitimate reason. And what better reason is there than to fear (excuse me, pretend to frar.) for your life? No one would think twice, so it's often misused- 664,500 times to be exact in the US each year alone. (See CDC)
We don't have to mention that this is more than unfair- it's deeply offensive. It Also places all those who actually are in danger more at risk for it poses the question of disbelief.
***Moral of the story, if you want to get 'rid-of-someone without a legitimate reason, lie.
Recently, we too were subject to a 'Crying-Wolf' scenario and of course we became outraged and used our first amendment rights to express the injustice. the subject hadn't wanted a restraining order at all. She simply was hyper-vigilant, and used the police as her own personal security. She filed a false police report and became tbe actual criminal.
•she claimed that we were always parking in front of her home, When all along it was just the one time. •she told the police that we were targeting her children And then presented a legally boy d 501c3 Non-Profit addressed 2 Her- not her children.
In fact she hadn't wanted any harm to come to us, nor had she wanted us arrested- hence no threat or she would tHen be proven unfit. However, at this point, she had already misled the police which gave the State the right to then prosecute if they so chose.
They did. ADA Angelica Gregory then 'created' the stalking and 'formulated' 4 charges as a means of strategy. Ms. Gregory 'stacked' the charges to include stalking with the presumption that we would run with our tail between our legs and accept a slap on the wrist- We didn't. Kids were used as leversge and that was UNACCEPTABLE.
the politically motivated ADA Angelica Gregory built her case ILLEGALLY.
Ms. Gregory believed she could bully a plea- she was wrong. Ms. Gregory built up a ridiculous case strictly to induce a fraudulent/perjured acceptance of guilt but didn't expect my integrity. Through 4 days of perjured testimony, she may have won the first round... but the truth will be forthwith.
(Kelly Rinaldi died in the cross-fire. In April 2016, we orchestrated an intervention to be executed in June. It never happened because I was falsely accused. July 22, 2016 Kelly Rinaldi passed away from a preventable disease.)
Just because Brooke perjured herself, (see proof below..) didn't mean I would.
State of NY vs. John Rinaldi
I've lived in the West Village for 19 years, and within two blocks of Ms. Shields for the last four. The 3 or 4 times I had come into contact with Ms. Shields was when I was either going to the pharmacy- same one I have gone to for 20 years, a thrift shop that I've been donating to for 10 years or so..., or the local Starbucks where I'd sit and write.
PROVEN BY: 1. Computer Forensics 2. Receipts.
PAGE 70, LINE 16 + 17 LIES. I can't imagine anything more ridiculous. It sounded good in court- which was the entire reason for falsifying this in court.
I'd like to also mention that Ms. Shields and I had lived in the same cities since 1995, and up until 2011 in different neighborhoods. Why is it that the only time I saw her in New York was when she moved into my neighborhood. If I was as she would like you to believe, I would have found her 15years ago,
The bottom line is that if I wasn't involved in trying to #STOPGunSchoolViolene, I wouldn't have bothered her with anything more than a hello, and she knows this.
PAGE 71, LINE 3-10.
Clearly Ms. Shields was referring to her actual stalkers because although she did in fact lie, she is too horrible an actress to lie/act.
PAGE 71, LINE 10-12. Leading the Witness/ Brooke Shields.
PAGE 71, LINE18.
PAGE 71, LINE 21-25. Line 22, NEVER HAPPENED. I had only seen Brooke 1x. And according to my Starbucks receipt had been working in the Starbucks on 10th St. from 7:30am - 10.
(I HAD A DMV appointment at 11.) The time I saw Ms. Shields was in the morning. I had gone outside for a cigarette and she walked past me. As a good neighbor and as I have for several others I offered up my parking spot.
PAGE 72, LINE 10-11. 'Yet Again?'
living within 2blocks of this 'person.' THE yet again was maybe 4 or 5 times in a 3/4 year span!
PAGE 72, LINE 14-17. bull-shit.
PAGE 72, LINE 23-25. My car was moved after my DMV appointment at roughly 3pm. It was also moved after it was found to have been vandalized/scratched.
iPAGE 73, LINE 1-7. As explsined, I had offered my parking spot to Ms. Shields as explsined earlier and specified which car was in fact mine.
PAGE 73, LINE 10 17. Objection. Witness/ Brooke Shields was testifying.
PAGE 73, LINE 14-16 An obvious message? There is nothing obvious about indicating which car was mine.
This is is a clear example of a sociopath creating a 'narrative' to fit a storyline.
PAGE 73, LINE 19-21 Really?? 'Here's her house, go steal her kids?'
I don't know about you, but WHO would say such a thing? Or better yet... insane.
PAGE 74, LINE 1-6 Proof of my car being vandalized/scratched and reason enough to take to social media to complain.
I did post post for Ms. Shields to tell her 'faggy' henchman to not touch my car..
PAGE 74, LINE 7-12. According to my on-line post, and after returning from the DMV, it was still early after-noon-NOT night.
What or WHEN was this event?
PAGE 74, LINE 14-17 I NEVER SAW BROOKE in the afternoon. If I had, I would've complained about my vehicle being touched. In addition, according to computer forensics there would also have been a record.
For social media success and to get followers, the times I had seen Ms. Shields in the neighborhood, I catalogued on line.
PAGE 74, LINE 13-22 i had just returned from the DMV (appointment verification available, as I made the appointment on line as to not have to wait in line..) and had gone inside my car to retrieve my computer.
'Lieutenant' Dan, came flying out of Ms. Shields' house like some lunatic so yes, I did move my vehicle.
Id like to also add, that I've had my vehicle in Manhattan for close to 5 years and the ONE TIME I park on W. 10th there's an issue?? I'd also like to add that having come into the city from upstate it was the only parking spot available AND it took me 45 minutes to find.
PAGE 74, LINE 24-25. It wasnt 'enough already' it was after I took to social media to complain about my vehicle being scratched.
Brooke and I essentially were in a pissibg match. She didn't like that I called her assistant 'faggy,' (which I agree was in bad taste, but not true.).
IF I WAS STALKING MS. SHIELDS, WHY THEN WOULD THEY HAVE BEGGED FOR A YEAR AND A HALF FOR ME TO ACCEPT A DISORDERLY CONDUCT?
PAGE 75, LINE 12-20 As I had stated earlier, I had stated to Ms. Shields I had a parking spot. In addition, according to my Starbucks Ap, I was in Starbucks working (with the entire staff on notice and had all offered as witness..) in the Starbucks on my non-profit.
The only mention of working out was because both Ms. Shields and her companion were in sweats, sweaty, and walking with water bottles.
SHE LIED, and thanks to computer forensics can prove it.
PAGE 75, LINE 23-25. THIS IS WHERE MS. SHIELDS fucked herself. There was/is no TWEET saying such thing or it would've been put into evidence.
NOT ONLY ARE WE GOING TO COURT TO APPEAL, BUT I WAS RELEASED FROM RYKERS AFTER A FEW DAYS BASED ON THE LIKLIHOOD OF MY WINNING.
AFTER WE WIN THE APPEAL, WE WILL THEN BE SUING FOR DAMAGES.
BULLYING IS LEARNED BEHAVIOR AND WE NEED TO EXPOSE THOSE WITHOUT A MORAL COMPASS, FOR THE LIARS THEY ARE.
PAGE 76, LINE 3-11. 5 times in a 6mo time period???
I live in the neighborhood and have been for close to 15 years.
PAGE 76, LINE 19-24. I have only parked 1x in front of Ms. Shields' home.
1 TIME IN 5 years.
PAGE 77, LINE 2-3. A report was made AFTER I went to social media to express my upset for having had my car touched.
PAGE 94, LINE 1-7 LIES. Brooke stated earlier that she does not engage, and she's stating I'm having these conversations??
These are in fact lies.
PAGE 94, LINE 8-15. LIES. We never discussed- in defense I had stated that I've lived in the West Village since first moving in '99. I also have stated (in my defense and in social media..) that I had lived their prior to her arrival and have never deviated from my paths of the course of 20 years..
The prosecution has extracted quite a bit from posts to create an elaborate plan. I know this because there have been several things posted that had been immaculate/ not to outright lie, but to get the 'offense' to well, perjure themselves.
PAGE 95, LINE 22-25 Mark Bailey is said to have stalked Ms. Shields. This man had sent things about himself. I'm. It sure of the details other than him bring naked was mentioned. Now, I'd normally be like most people and condemn him. But, after experiencing Ms. Shields' lying first hand.. I don't know.
All I know is the only thing I had sent post puberty had been a solicitation from Newtown, CT based solely on the Massacre of Sandy Hook. In addition, it was also a 'form' letter that was similarly sent to: Sarah Jessica Parker, Liv Tyler, and Hugh Jackman. They did accompany sacred SandyHook artifacts that to call a toy would be incredibly insensitive and extremely ignorant.